Skip to content

President Obama Bows Down To Saudi King Abdullah.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

President Obama: What Is It That You Do Not Understand?

International Analyst Network - ‎19 hours ago‎

Here is the travesty, the most powerful man on earth bends over and bows deeply to Saudis’ King Abdullah, who is well known for his support of Wahhabi …

_____________________

Wahhabi is a particular harsh brand of the Islamic Religion based upon the words of Allah (the Koran) and the Sunna (the words and actions of Mohammed found in the Sira and the Hadith).  Islam seeks world domination by four kinds of Jihad (according to Mohammed)-sword, pen, mouth and money.  The Saudi King named Abdullah is a specialist in Jihad against the unbelieving non-Islamic world by means of pen, mouth, and money.  In addition many from the Saudia Arabian Kingdom elect to spend their lives in Jihad by sword. 

The Saudi King Abdullah’s Wahhabi brand of Islam promotes the dreaded Shariah Law through out the world.  Marriage and divorce are the most significant aspects of sharia, but criminal law is the most controversial. In the Saudi Arabia brand of  sharia, punishments like flogging, stoning, amputation, exile, or execution are still used at times. 

Islam holds that there are only three kinds of people in the world:  Muslims, Kafirs, and Dhimmis.  Islam speaks of two kinds of enemies.  There is the “far enemy” and the “near enemy.”  The “far enemy” are all the kafirs (unbelievers) of the world.  The “near enemy” is the dhimmi.   A dhimmi is a kafir (an unbeliever) who nevertheless serves Islam. In the jihad now in progress against our American kafir civilization, most of the actual work of attacking our civilization is being done by the “near enemy,” the dhimmi.

When our State Department starts controlling the language of memos and forbids the use of the word “jihad”, these are actions by non-Muslims, dhimmis, who are being used as puppets of Political Islam. It was not a Muslim who issued the State Department directive.  It is not that Islam is so strong, but that kafirs are so weak and ignorant that they become dhimmis.

When President Obama bowed down to Saudi King Abdullah, he was seen by muslims as a kafir so weak and ignorant that he signals his willingness to become a dhimmi puppet.  All kafirs and dhimmis are considered unbelievers destined for Hell in the hereafter.  Therefore the taking of the lives of kafirs, especially Christians, are considered as acts of religious merit by those committed to Jihad by sword.

However, “God so loved the world (loved even those destined to become Muslims) that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes on  Him should not perish, but have eternal life.”  (John 3:16).  The true and realistic hope of the Islamic people is the gift of hope given by God the Father through Christ.

With love,  F. M. Perry        

 

Filed in All | Comments (0)

If You Could See Where I Have Gone.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

If You Could See Where I Have Gone.

Dedicated to the memory of my beloved Charlotte.

Author unknown.  Reprinted from the publication GEM, Nacogdoches, Texas.

___________________

 

 

If you could see where I have gone,

The beauty of this place,

And how it feels to know you’re home,

To see the Savior’s face.

To wake in peace and know no fear,

Just joy beyond compare.

While still on earth you miss me yet

You shouldn’t want me there,

If you could see where I have gone.

 

If you could see where I have gone,

Have made the trip with me,

You’d know I didn’t come alone,

The Savior came with me.

When I awoke, He was by my side,

And reached down His hand.

Don’t worry over those you love,

For I’m just not with you.

And don’t you know with you at home,

They’ll long to be here, too.

 

If you could see where I have gone

And see what I’ve been shown,

You’d never know another fear,

Or feel alone.

You’d marvel at the care of God

His hand on every life,

And realize He really cares,

And bears with us each strife.

And that He weeps when one is lost

His heart is filled with pain.

But, oh the joy when one comes home,

A child is at home again.

 

If you could see where I have gone,

Could stay awhile with me

Could share the things God has made

To grace eternity.

But, no, you wouldn’t ever leave

Once heaven’s joy you’d known.

You couldn’t bear to walk earth’s paths

Once heaven was your home,

If you could see where I have gone.

 

If you could see where I have gone,

You’d know we’d meet some day.

And though I’m parted with you now

That I’m “just away,”

So thank you, thank you everyone,

For living for the Lord

For encouraging me to love Him

To trust in His word.

And now that I’m home with Him

Secure in every way,

I’m waiting here at Heaven’s door,

To greet you some sweet day.

____________________

Comment: 

I found the attached poem and felt as though it expressed the destiny of my wife who recently passed away.  I first published it on my Journal last November.  I was surprised to get one comment that seemed to say that this poem did not express Biblical truth.

The one who made the comment perhaps happened to believe that physical death of the Christian’s body is Biblically stated to be a sleep so sound that the death experience is absolutely nothing except a restful sleep until the Lord comes again to raise, change, and enliven the dead bodies.  (1 Corinthians 15:20-58.)  I sincerely  believe this Scripture and am relieved and thankful that my wife’s body experiences this restful sleep.

But then I read of the spiritual work of the personal souls during earthly life, and even the work of disembodied Christian souls who have departed the environs of this earth after phyical death.  (1 Thessolians 5:23; Hebrews 4:12-13; Luke 16:19-31; 23:43; Revelation 6:9-11; 20:4-6; 1 Peter 2-5)
These and other Scriptures make me wonder if the personal souls of Christians who are put to work in the Kingdom of God during physical life on earth are not also kept at work after death of the body even though the Lord has not yet come to raise the dead bodies.  Or does the personal spiritual soul of the Christian simply sleep with the body until the coming of Christ to provide resurrection?  I do not know the final answer and must be satisfied to wait and see.
However, every line of the above poem is Biblically true if understood as figures of speech which Jesus was always apt to speak during His life on earth. We are not yet equipped for the truth in heavenly language. I believe the poem is true in the language of Faith, Hope, and Love to be experienced in spiritual reality.  (Luke 4:46; Acts 7:59; Revelation 6:9-11; 20:4-6).  The writer of this poem (a modern psalm) is endebted to the Lord for his substantive understanding  of  God’s gift of Hope.  God’s gifts of Faith, Hope, and Love are not for earthly life only but also for the new Heaven and Earth.    
   
With love,  F. M. Perry.
Filed in All | Comments (0)

A Victim At The Democratic Convention, by Bill Warner

Saturday, April 4, 2009

 Dr. Warner informs how Islam executes “soft jihad” in America.  Your Host, F. M. Perry.

 

A Victim at the Democratic Convention

Dr. Ingrid Mattson, President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), took part in the Democratic Convention in Denver.

As a brief aside, the ISNA is a front for the Muslim Brotherhood (its stated purpose is to destroy the West from inside) and is also included as an unindicted co-conspirator in terrorism financing conspiracy. All of the armed force’s Muslim chaplain’s and prison chaplains have to take Dr. Mattson’s course on Islam. In the course she supports Sharia law to replace our Constitution in order to achieve an “ethical” government. Like Obama, she believes that poverty and social oppression caused the September 11 attack on the World Trade Center. Neither one will speak of any basis for the attack in Islamic doctrine.

There are four kinds of jihad-sword, pen, mouth and money. Dr. Mattson is a jihadist of the pen and mouth version. Some people call it soft jihad.

At the Convention she spoke of Muslims as being victims in America. Poor Muslim immigrants have to leave their Islamic earthly paradises and come to a mean America where they are victims of the cruel kafirs.

But in Islam it is Sunna. Mohammed was a victim of oppression, so Muslims are always victims and never oppressors.

Examine the record. In Medina Mohammed sent out his jihadists eight times before they were able to kill their first kafir and steal the kafirs’ wealth. They had their success in a holy month. The Arabs had rules of war and one of those rules was that there were holy months when no Arab was to attack another. So the Arabs complained that Mohammed had broken the rules of war and was oppressing other Arabs.

Mohammed was troubled by the charge of being a war criminal, but Allah came to his rescue:

Koran 2:216 You are commanded to fight although you dislike it. You may hate something that is good for you, and love something that is bad for you. Allah knows and you do not. When they ask you about fighting in the holy month, say: Fighting at this time is a serious offense, but it is worse in Allah’s eyes to deny others the path to Him, to disbelieve in Him, and to drive His worshippers out of the Sacred Mosque. Idolatry is a greater sin than murder.

The way of life for the kafir Arabs that included their religion (idolatry is a greater sin than murder) made them fair game for jihad. The kafir Arabs had only one fault-they did not believe that Mohammed was the prophet of Allah. What the kafir Arabs had done by telling Mohammed to leave town (drive His worshippers out of the Sacred Mosque) was worse than war.

In short, the poor Muslims were the victims, and the dead kafirs were the oppressors. It has been ever thus for 1400 years.

All jihad is defensive. The kafirs make the first offensive move against Islam by not believing in the prophet-hood of Mohammed.

Dr. Mattson follows the doctrine of political Islam to the letter when she declares that Muslims are victims in America. And there is only one way that Muslims will stop being oppressed in America. Only when we live under Sharia law will the oppression stop. It would seem that Obama and the Democrats are doing what they can at this time to assure that no Muslim will be a victim.

Bill Warner

Permalink http:

Of Interest

Frank Gaffney wrote a piece on soft jihad at the Democratic convention.Here is Robert Spencer’s take on the same event.//www.politicalislam.com/blog/a-vicitim-at-the-democratic-convention/

copyright (c) CBSX, LLC

politicalislam.com Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.

Love from your host, F. M. Perry

 

Filed in All | Comments (0)

The Bush Islamic Doctrine

Friday, April 3, 2009
Islam is far more than a religion.  It is a political way of life.  Many of us believe that Islam is totally represented by the Koran (Islam’s religious book).  But the Koran has never been understood by Muslims without the other books which are Muhammad’s commentary on the Koran.  The Koran is incapable of being understood without Muhammad’s comments and actions which explain the contradictions and utter chaos of the Koran.
(Have you ever tried to read the Koran all the way through and make rational sense of it.  I have.  In the end I could make but one clear statement of its purpose:  It is anti-Christ.  It was written to destroy Christianity as presented in its introductory phases in the Old Testament and in its full presentation in the New Testament.  So Islamists hate both Jews and Christians.)           

But Islam, a way of life, consists of three books. the Koran, The Sira, and The Hadith.  This is explained in greater detail by Bill Warner, Phd, and sponsor of  internet website http://www.politicalislam.com:     

“There is one, and only one, correct basis for the terms and names to be used in describing anything Islamic. That basis is the doctrine of Islam, which is only found in the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. The Sunna (what Mohammed did and said) is found in the Sira (Mohammed’s biography) and the Hadith (Mohammed’s traditions). All religious and political Islamic doctrine is found in the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith. The definitive Sira is by Ibn Ishaq. There are six collections of Hadith, but the most authoritative is Bukhari. Everything is found in Koran, Sira and Hadith-three books. Upon close examination that amounts to all of Islam is Mohammed (remember, he is the only one who ever heard the words of Allah).

“Let us address the other source of information about Islam-experts. There are two kinds of experts-Muslim and kafir (non-Muslims). But in either case, if the expert agrees with Mohammed, the expert is right, but he is redundant. If the expert disagrees with Mohammed, the expert is wrong. So experts are either redundant or wrong. The only expert that can be trusted to be 100% correct in every case is Mohammed. So why bother with any other expert?”

In the so-called War on Terror (against Al Quida), our country is so intent on not appearing to be making war on “a religion,” that many of our leaders are ignorant of the fact that Political Islam, represented by Al Quida, is Religious Islam.  There is but one Islam and it is represented by the terror groups Al Quida, Hezbolah, Hamas, and other terror groups.  It is a basic fundamental of Islam to force, by terror and infiltration, the Islamic Religious/Political System on the whole world.  It has already made great headway in Europe and is farther infiltrated into the United States than many of us realize.
The attached article below by Bill Warner explains our misnderstandings better than I can.
Certainly Biblical
Christianity movtivates Christians to wage a “spiritual war” emphsizing God’s Love for all humanity and the Christian’s love for his neighbor as himself.  (Ephesians 6:10-20).  However, our Civil Government may be forced to fight terror with terror.
With love, F. M. Perry    
     
Following is Bill Warner’s article written from a recommended political view of our civil government.  It has many truths useful to the warriors of Christian Spiritual warfare. 

 

The Bush Islamic Doctrine

We were introduced the power of political Islam on September 11, 2001. For a few people 9/11 was a declaration of war against our civilization and those people have been struggling against Islam. It is time to stop and ask: How are we doing? We are losing on every front.

A definition: Kafirs are the non-Muslims who are fighting against Islam. Dhimmis are the apologists for Islam—the media, Obama, George Bush, the professors, preachers, priests, politicians, pundits and rabbis.

Why are the kafirs losing? Because Islam is so strong? No, because we are waging war with a strategy that is destined to fail. We are losing because we using a losing strategy. George Bush planted the seeds of our strategy when he declared that 9/11 was an act of terrorists and he laid out the strategy that would lead to our cultural self-destruction. Here is the Bush Islamic doctrine:

· Islam is a religion similar to Christianity. Christians, Jews and Muslims all worship the same god.
· The problem is terrorism, not Islam, hence, “The War on Terror.”
· There are moderate Muslims and a few extremist Muslims.
· A good Muslim means that Islam is good.
· “Radicals” cause the violence.
· Islam is found in the Koran.
· The “bad stuff” in the Koran is just how it is interpreted.
· Good Muslims will reform the “terrorists.”

Not a single item is true. Each and every one is false and has no basis in Islamic doctrine. But everybody bought it. Why? For the same reason that Bush said it. It was the academic doctrine of Islam that the Ivy League taught. The media, professors, preachers, priests, politicians, pundits and rabbis had all been taught the same doctrine to interpret Islam. The Bush doctrine is not only unquestioned, but now has achieved the status of revealed truth. To deny it is to be a bigot.

So Bush did not create the doctrine, he was just a spokesman for the elites. There is a great irony in calling it the Bush doctrine, since more progressives/liberals/Leftists/Democrats believe it than do conservatives. Boxer, Reid, Pelosi and Obama are advocates of the Bush doctrine.

Let’s see how the Bush doctrine works to prevent actual learning about the truth of Islam. Take the jihad in Mumbai, India where several Jews and hundreds of Hindus were injured and murdered. The words “Islam” and “Muslims” were barely mentioned by the media. The problem was terrorism, not jihad. The dhimmis did not want to malign the moderate Muslims by bringing up the Islam angle. It was just a few radicals who had highjacked Islam who attacked the kafirs in Mumbai.

How many mindless (mindless on the part of the Christians and Jews) interfaith dialogues have we seen? Religious leaders all get on stage and go on about how they worship the same god. Not one of these so-called Christian and Jewish leaders has actually read the Koran. It is the Koran that defines Allah and if you don’t know what is in it, you don’t know anything about Allah. But not to worry. The Bush doctrine holds it to be true and that is enough. What religious leader has had the time over the last eight years to read the Koran or the life of Mohammed? They have had plenty of time, but they don’t need to do so; they are comforted by the lies of the Bush doctrine.

The Cork in the Bottle

Let’s say that you are talking to a dhimmi and you bring up some evil of Islam. What do they say?

· Christians did bad things, too.
· There is violence in the Bible, too.
· They (jihadis) are some fundamentalist/radical types. All fundamentalists are bad. Most Muslims are just like everybody else.
· The ultimate mind cork: “I know this Muslim at work. He is nice. Subtext: I can’t hear you.” (A good Muslim means that Islam is good.)

Every thrust is parried with the Bush doctrine of Islam. The Bush doctrine is the cork in the bottle. Every time we try to pour some wine of truth into a dhimmi’s head, it is corked by the Bush doctrine.

Terror

And how have we responded to the Bush Islamic doctrine? For the most part, we have bought the Bush terror model of Islam. We try to stuff everything into terror/jihad. Since no one likes terror/jihad, it can be condemned. But Islam is very clever. There are four kinds of jihad—sword, pen, tongue and money. If they skip the terror part and go straight to the soft jihad, then the kafirs talking about the terror/jihad approach to Islam are soon ignored. The media skips the terror/jihad now. There have been numerous jihadist events in America, but the FBI and the media never admit that Islam is involved. The worst was Mumbai, India. It was pure jihad, the attack on the Jews proved that, but Islam and the Muslims were never mentioned. No Islam here. Move right along. There is no man behind the curtain.

The terror approach bears a relationship to crying “Wolf!” After while, no one really worries about terror and the lack of it proves that Islam is good.

The major problem with dealing with “terror” is that it takes away from watching the real destructive force in America—Sharia law and the slow Islamification of our culture.

Education and Debate

When you are trying to educate someone about Islam, it helps to go over the Bush doctrine and point out that not a single statement in it is true. Up front, challenge their beliefs.

Bill Warner

Permalink http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/the-bush-islamic-doctrine/

copyright (c) CBSX, LLC

politicalislam.com Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.

Filed in All | Comments (0)

Obama’s Ponzi Scheme.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

“Woe, woe, the great city, Babylon, the strong city! For in one hour your judgment has come. … For in one hour such great wealth has been laid waste. … because all the nations were deceived by your sorcery.” (Revelation 18: 17, 19, 23).

_________________________ 

Obama’s Ponzi Scheme.

President Barack Obama’s Trillion dollar bailout scheme bears many characteristics of the criminal Ponzi scheme for which Mr. Bernard Madoff has now been convicted. One difference is that Mr.Madoff conducted his scheme in secret and Mr. Obama is conducting his scheme in the full sight of the investors, the American taxpayers. Moreover, Mr. Obama’s scheme (involving much more money than Mr. Madoff’s scheme) is being imposed openly on present and future taxpayers for many years to come. The money for tax payer investment is not yet in hand and must be borrowed by the government in behalf of the future taxpayers. Mr. Obama’s scheme appears to be a multi generational Ponzi scheme in which future generations are to be left holding the empty bag from a fraudulent investment for which Congress made them responsible. A seemingly mesmerized Congress is “falling for” or “promoting” Mr. Obama’s scheme “hook, line, and sinker.”

I understand from reading Google’s Wikipedia that a Ponzi Scheme is similar in many respects to a Pyramid Scheme. The definition of a Pyramid Scheme is given as “a non- sustainable business model that involves the exchange of money primarily for enrolling other people into the scheme often without any product or service being delivered.” The definition of a Ponzi scheme is given as “a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to investors from their own money or money paid by subsequent investors rather than from profits. The Ponzi scheme usually offers abnormally high short term returns in order to entice new investors. The perpetuation of returns that a Ponzi scheme advertises, and sometimes pays requires an ever increasing flow of money from investors in order to keep the scheme going.”

In Mr. Obama’s fraudulent scheme the investors are the tax payers and they are given no choice to opt in or out of the investment. The money “invested” is borrowed for them from potential enemy countries, like China, who then charge interest on the money provided. The “investment” is branded as fraudulent from the beginning by many in Congress by their statements that ” maybe some of the money eventually will be paid back to the tax payers.” There is no real assurance or even expectation that the “investment” will be paid back in full with profit to the tax-payers from successful productive use of the money. But Mr. Obama plans to tax the citizens of America to pay the interest and reduce the principal of the debt which was hurriedly incurred to make the so-called “investment” possible.

Mr. Obama’s scheme is like a Ponzi scheme in that it is presented as an investment that had to be made quickly or the “opportunity” would be lost. There was said to be no time to scrutinize the merits of the scheme. As a result of being stampeded into such quick Congressional action, billions of dollars have already been lost forever down a black hole. Already the Obama Ponzi scheme is calling for more money for the so-called “bailout investments” are not working to make any pay back. Tax Payer job losses are increasing and depression is deepening.

Mr. Madoff was convicted of his fraudulent scheme this morning. Please read the latest news about Mr. Madoff by entering the attached URL in your browser:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/mar/12/madoff-jailed-after-guilty-plea

With sorrow I remain: F. M. Perry

 

Filed in World | Comments (0)